Who Is A Member Of Alcoholics Anonymous?
The
origins of our Third Tradition By Bill W.
The first edition of
the book Alcoholics Anonymous
makes this brief statement about membership: "The only requirement for
membership is an honest desire to stop drinking. We are not allied with any
particular faith, sect or denomination, nor do we oppose anyone. We simply wish
to be helpful to those who are afflicted." This expressed our feeling as
of 1939, the year our book was published.
Since that day all
kinds of experiments with membership have been tried. The number of membership
rules which have been made (and mostly broken!) are legion. Two or three years
ago the Central Office asked the groups to list their membership rules and send
them in. After they arrived we set them all down. They took a great many sheets
of paper. A little reflection upon these many rules brought us to an
astonishing conclusion. If all of these edicts had been in force everywhere at
once it would have been practically impossible for any alcoholic to have ever
joined Alcoholics Anonymous. About nine-tenths of our oldest and best members
could never have got by!
Who'd Have Lasted?
In some cases we
would have been too discouraged by the demands made upon us. Most of the early
members of AA would have been thrown out because they slipped too much, because
their morals were too bad, because they had mental as well as alcoholic
difficulties. Or, believe it or not, because they did not come from the
so-called better classes of society. We oldsters could have been excluded for
our failure to read the book Alcoholics
Anonymous or the refusal of our sponsor to vouch for us as a candidate. And
so on, ad infinitum. The way our
"worthy" alcoholics have sometimes tried to judge the "less
worthy" is, as we look back on it, rather comical. Imagine, if you can,
one alcoholic judging another!
At one time or
another most AA groups go on rule-making benders. Naturally enough, too, as a
group commences to grow rapidly it is confronted with many alarming problems.
Panhandlers begin to pan-handle. Members get drunk and sometimes get others
drunk with them. Those with mental difficulties throw depressions or break out
into paranoid denunciations of fellow members. Gossips gossip, and righteously
denounce the local Wolves and Red Riding Hoods. Newcomers argue that they
aren't alcoholics at all, but keep coming around anyway. "Slippees"
trade on the fair name of AA, in order to get themselves jobs. Others refuse to
accept all the Twelve Steps of the recovery program. Some go still further,
saying that the "God business" is bunk and quite unnecessary. Under
these conditions our conservative program-abiding members get scared. These
appalling conditions must be controlled, they think. Else AA will surely go to
rack and ruin. They view with alarm for the good of the movement!
At this point the
group enters the rule and regulation phase. Charters, by-laws, and membership
rules are excitedly passed and authority is granted committees to filter out undesirables
and discipline the evil doers. Then the group elders, now clothed with
authority, commence to get busy. Recalcitrants are cast into the outer
darkness, respectable busybodies throw stones at the sinners. As for the
so-called sinners, they either insist on staying around, or else they form a
new group of their own. Or maybe they join a more congenial and less intolerant
crowd in their neighborhood. The elders soon discover that the rules and
regulations aren't working very well. Most attempts at enforcement generate
such waves of dissension and intolerance in the group that this condition is
presently recognized to be worse for the group life than the very worst that
the worst ever did.
After a time fear and
intolerance subside. The group survives unscathed. Everybody has learned a
great deal. So it is, that few of us are any longer afraid of what any newcomer
can do to our AA reputation or effectiveness. Those who slip, those who
pan-handle, those who scandalize, those with mental twists, those who rebel at
the program, those who trade on the AA reputation--all such persons seldom harm
an AA group for long. Some of these have become our most respected and best
loved. Some have remained to try our patience, sober nevertheless. Others have
drifted away. We have begun to regard these ones not as menaces, but rather as
our teachers. They oblige us to cultivate patience, tolerance and humility. We
finally see that they are only people sicker than the rest of us, that we who
condemn them are the Pharisees whose false righteousness does our group the
deeper spiritual damage.
Ours Not to Judge
Every older AA
shudders when he remembers the names of persons he once condemned; people he
confidently predicted would never sober up; persons he was sure ought to be thrown
out of AA for the good of the movement. Now that some of these very persons
have been sober for years, and may be numbered among his best friends, the
old-timer thinks to himself "What if everybody had judged these people as
I once did? What if AA had slammed its door in their faces? Where would they be
now?"
That is why we all
judge the newcomer less and less. If alcohol is an uncontrollable problem to
him and he wishes to do something about it, that is enough for us. We care not
whether his case is severe or light, whether his morals are good or bad,
whether he has other complications or not. Our AA door stands wide open, and if
he passes through it and commences to do anything at all about his problem, he
is considered a member of Alcoholics Anonymous. He signs nothing, agrees to
nothing, promises nothing. We demand nothing. He joins us on his own say so.
Nowadays, in most groups, he doesn't even have to admit he is an alcoholic. He
can join AA on the mere suspicion that he may be one, that he may already show
the fatal symptoms of our malady.
Of course this is not
the universal state of affairs throughout AA. Membership rules still exist. If
a member persists in coming to meetings drunk he may be led outside; we may ask
someone to take him away. But in most groups he can come back next day, if
sober. Though he may be thrown out of a club, nobody thinks of throwing him out
of AA. He is a member as long as he says he is. While this broad concept of AA
membership is not yet unanimous, it does represent the main current of AA
thought today. We do not wish to deny anyone his chance to recover from
alcoholism. We wish to be just as inclusive as we can, never exclusive.
Perhaps this trend
signifies something much deeper than a mere change of attitude on the question
of membership. Perhaps it means that we are losing all fear of those violent
emotional storms which sometimes cross our alcoholic world; perhaps it bespeaks
our confidence that every storm will be followed by a calm; a calm which is
more understanding, more compassionate, more tolerant than any we ever knew
before.
Bill W.
Comments